France asserted their dominance throughout the match and clinched a spot in the EURO 2024 quarterfinals by finding the back of the net.
Didier Deschamps made a bold move by keeping Ousmane Dembélé on the bench and deploying Antoine Griezmann as a right winger, a position he’s not accustomed to. Griezmann’s strengths in combinations, attacking threats, and defensive discipline outweighed Dembélé’s qualities, though questions arose post-match about this decision.
ALLEZ LES BLEUS !!! 0-0 | #FRABEL | #FiersdetreBleus pic.twitter.com/vio15kM5X9
Marcus Thuram led the attack while Kylian Mbappé operated on the left flank, leaving Bradley Barcola on the bench.
Deschamps structured the team in a 4-3-3 formation with Griezmann in a more central role on the right wing.
Belgium focused on a defensive approach in a 4-4-2 formation, straying from their usual 4-2-3-1 setup with Kevin De Bruyne as the playmaker.
Voor Vorst, voor Vrijheid en voor Recht! Le Roi, la Loi, la Liberté ! Gesetz und König und die Freiheit hoch! #FRABEL pic.twitter.com/SJsgDuKW1J
De Bruyne played a deeper role as a midfielder, and Doku became more defensive to adapt to Belgium’s strategy, causing challenges during the game.
Deschamps’ Tactical Gamble
Deschamps received criticism for changing the team’s formation to a 4-3-3, focusing more on the midfield trio’s functionality rather than Griezmann’s playmaking role. Despite initial struggles, their cohesion led to a pivotal goal.
While Griezmann lacked creativity, the trio’s balance between defense and attack satisfied Deschamps. Some suggest reverting to a 4-2-3-1 formation with Dembélé instead of Rabiot could have sharpened their attack.
Deschamps believes their defensive setup will pay off in the playoffs, emphasizing the importance of a solid defense.
Belgium’s Flawed Attack Plan
Tedesco’s plan to execute counterattacks fell flat as Belgium struggled to break France’s solid defense. Lukaku’s battles with Saliba hindered their forward progression.
France’s pressing stifled De Bruyne and Doku, depriving Belgium of attacking opportunities and creative flair.
Belgium’s failure to capitalize on their attacking potential highlighted the tactical missteps in their gameplay.
Mbappé’s Impact and Inconsistencies
Mbappé’s performance on the left flank was inconsistent, hindering France’s attacking flow. Despite his individual brilliance, he faltered in creating cohesive plays.
However, Mbappé’s runs and shots showcased his attacking prowess, adding value to France’s offensive strategies.
Defensive Showdown: Doku vs Koundé
The duel between Doku and Koundé was pivotal. Doku’s threats were neutralized by Koundé’s timely interventions, with support from Kanté and Tchouaméni.
Koundé’s defensive prowess and attacking contributions against Doku’s threats illustrate Deschamps’ tactical success.
France’s Defensive Resilience
France’s defensive setup, anchored by Kanté, Tchouaméni, and the backline, nullified Belgium’s key players like De Bruyne, showcasing their defensive strength.
The defensive solidity ensures France’s ability to stifle opponents, a key asset in their upcoming quarterfinal clash against Portugal.
Key Players in France’s Victory
Tchouaméni’s midfield proficiency and Kolo Muani’s decisive goal underpin France’s potential success. Their contributions in midfield and attack provide the necessary balance for France’s campaign.
France’s cohesive defensive and midfield strategies, coupled with key performances, position them as strong contenders in the EURO 2024 tournament.